The interesting thing brought up in the article is that there isn't really any disagreement on the facts for politicians and police... You don't really have to have a trial as they are de-facto immoral and guilty by participating in the immoral and illogical system and keeping their neighbors in tax slavery and imprisoning them for victimless crimes. It is essentially the case that economist Dr. Robert Higgs makes in his logical syllogism which could just as easily be slightly re-written for politicians :
The "good/bad cop" question can be disposed of decisively. We need only consider the following:
i. Every cop has agreed, as part of his job, is to enforce laws; all of them.
ii. Many of the laws are manifestly unjust, or even cruel and wicked.
iii. Therefore, every cop has agreed to act as an enforcer of laws that are manifestly unjust, or even cruel and wicked.
There are no good cops.
~ Dr. Robert Higgs
It would be different for Pedophiles but the thought experiment there is what if a Pedophile was caught in the act by 12 just men (and/or women) and they convened a jury right there...
I like that... 12 just men, local men, who know at least one of the parties, convene a jury on the spot. No judge needed. Judges are just administrators of the courts. Not needed. Just men can determine both the law and guilt. No attorneys, as all men can satisfy their own claims.
In a just and moral society even laws are not needed. Only conscience. 12 just, moral, conscientious men can fulfill justic3.
On that note, why don't we start convening in our own "courts" and satisfying justice?
Where a politician exists a crime exists. Where a police officer exists, a crime exists. I would say the same for pedophiles.
Anyone who abuses children deserves a terrible death. Pedophilia is just about the worst thing a human can entertain. May all pedos hang from a short rope.
The interesting thing brought up in the article is that there isn't really any disagreement on the facts for politicians and police... You don't really have to have a trial as they are de-facto immoral and guilty by participating in the immoral and illogical system and keeping their neighbors in tax slavery and imprisoning them for victimless crimes. It is essentially the case that economist Dr. Robert Higgs makes in his logical syllogism which could just as easily be slightly re-written for politicians :
The "good/bad cop" question can be disposed of decisively. We need only consider the following:
i. Every cop has agreed, as part of his job, is to enforce laws; all of them.
ii. Many of the laws are manifestly unjust, or even cruel and wicked.
iii. Therefore, every cop has agreed to act as an enforcer of laws that are manifestly unjust, or even cruel and wicked.
There are no good cops.
~ Dr. Robert Higgs
It would be different for Pedophiles but the thought experiment there is what if a Pedophile was caught in the act by 12 just men (and/or women) and they convened a jury right there...
I like that... 12 just men, local men, who know at least one of the parties, convene a jury on the spot. No judge needed. Judges are just administrators of the courts. Not needed. Just men can determine both the law and guilt. No attorneys, as all men can satisfy their own claims.
In a just and moral society even laws are not needed. Only conscience. 12 just, moral, conscientious men can fulfill justic3.
On that note, why don't we start convening in our own "courts" and satisfying justice?
Where a politician exists a crime exists. Where a police officer exists, a crime exists. I would say the same for pedophiles.
Woah that’s going into French Revolution things
So long as those three groups exist, they will be a danger to good people
Truth
Pedophilia is a preference, not an act. And it's not even chosen. Implying, much less saying that pedophiles should be punished is evil.
Anyone who abuses children deserves a terrible death. Pedophilia is just about the worst thing a human can entertain. May all pedos hang from a short rope.