5 Comments

If like me you are sick of being abused by your so called leaders you now have the option to leave the system and it is completely lawful.

In fact by paying taxes you are now funding war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.

More details here; https://truthaddict.substack.com/p/how-to-exit-the-matrix

Expand full comment

Important topic, well done!

For me, the most important take away in your video is at 8:30> Alu says

“If in a lifetime, secession happens on the state level, then obviously the end goal for Voluntaryism, [is to carry secession to its fullest freedom] the smallest minority [sovereign unit] is the individual…every person should govern their own life.”

Here is Tom Woods on this, he is one of best on it:

https://tomwoods.com/ep-1963-secession-not-when-or-why-but-how/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXOEdvfMeIY

As a Voluntaryist EACH OF US as an INDEPENDENT SOVEREIGN UNIT SHOULD SECEDE from EVERY COLLECTIVE and trade peacefully thereafter.

As Murray Rothbard trenchantly (his favorite adjective) puts it:

“Once one concedes that a single world government is not necessary, then where does one logically stop at the permissibility of separate states? If Canada and the United States can be separate nations without being denounced as in a state of impermissible ‘anarchy’, why may not the South secede from the United States? New York State from the Union? New York City from the state? Why may not Manhattan secede? Each neighbourhood? Each block? Each house? Each person?”

Get free, stay free.

Expand full comment

Freedom starts with growing our own food - and making sure that art doesn't skip a generation, as we've allowed so many teachings to be taken away from us. Thank you for everything you do.

Expand full comment

Yessir! The fundamentals. Grow food, plant trees, and let the water flow.

Expand full comment

Is New Hampshire’s problem about the source of the limitless political funds---such as from the Demo’s ActBlue or for Globalist oppression ? This analysis of the Federal Reserve operation, submitted to be the methodology of their scheme, is submitted for their consideration.

The following analysis of the Federal Reserve claims the scheme has transferred $34 Trillion in profit to covert private owners of the scheme over the past 100 years---that legally belongs to the government. It is not information the Fed allows any financial entity to reveal.

My professor teaching a graduate course of Money and Banking informed the class that Deficit Spending Treasury securities [DS] are transferred from the U.S. Treasury to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, as fiscal agent for the government, to begin the creation of book-entry credit for government to spend. This private Credit for the government to spend is made by fiat book-entry into a government account. The disposal of the securities is never discussed.

The research analysis pasted below traces the flow of funds from the DS disposition of the security received.  Information from TreasuryDirect [TD] Institutional tabulations historically revealed that components of the DS securities are added to auctioned securities for redeeming maturing securities in the market. The auctions exceed $15 trillion annually. 31 CFR §375.3 identifies the FRBNY has exclusive control for the handling of auction funds and any related action they wish to claim.  The relevant accounts are client accounts [not operational accounts] and have never been audited.  TD historically tabulated the separated DS components as 'new cash.'  TD responded to email inquiries as to disposition of New Cash by saying they were used to pay government bills. 

The claim was bogus.  Such a flow of funds [from market to government] would not result in inflation nor would it add to the National Debt.  The funds from DS securities [which have totaled to $34 Trillion over 100 years] had to go to a private entity.  The covert shareholders of the FR Board of Governors, Inc., or a closely held corporation of a similar name, is an assumed destination. The funds, as profit, legally belong to the government. The GAO has standing authority to audit any handling of such government money.  The Bloomberg v. Fed case, 2nd Circuit CoA, 2010, identifies such records to be subject to FOIA.

The Federal Reserve Notes were historically identified as to be redeemable in gold, silver, or lawful money. Bogus legislation allowed them to be identifiable as a Legal Tender. By this means, the taxpayers have become responsible for the credit created by the Fed. With the New York financiers, alleged by conspiracy theorists as being shareholders of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, Inc., in large part collectors of mature Treasury securities for redeeming, the securities held by them would get priority for available funds in the event of national bankruptcy. Stockholders of the Fed, such as the BIS, would, in fact, control the government’s revenue in the same manner Troika controls the government finances of Greece. Ref. 31 CFR §375.3.

Is the banking problem relevant to Benjamin Ginsberg’s compilation of catastrophic historic European economic systems in his FATAL EMBRACE: [bankers] AND THE STATE ?

As has been pointed out, it is not politicians that clamor for war/globalism ; it is bankers.

Respectfully,

Jim Carter

Taxation is an attribute of sovereignty. That over which the taxing entity is not sovereign is not a suitable object to tax. A State is not able to tax federal assets, nor can it tax purchases by the Fed government.

All states are required to maintain a Republican government. Article IV, Section 4. Citizens are Sovereign in a Republican govt.

IRS computer printouts of claimed income tax values without adjudication evidence are used by states to assess claimed taxes. The values are hearsay and subject to objection and challenge---but maybe not if the individual submits to an administrative review of the states' assessment.

A Constitutional Right [Trial by Jury] cannot be destroyed by Amendment. If Sovereignty of Citizens can be destroyed by 16th Amendment, it is a coup. If a judge enforces a coup, it has violated the oath of office and voids jurisdiction and is impersonating a government officer.

The IRS has been weaponized by the SCOTUS with the recent case of Moore v IRS via the precedent of assessed taxes on non-received value. After the IRS gradually introduces the methodology, the increased value of your home, or the junk pile behind your barn, if you are a ‘social terrorist’, will be administratively taxed. Protesting, in the corrupt courts, as Trump has found out, will virtually bankrupt anyone. An unaware sworn signature on a tax form, over the label of “Taxpayer’s name,” is accepted by a corrupt court to assume the individual is legally responsible and the IRS does not have to allege violation of a “known legal duty” for valid process. The court is ingenious on shifting the Burden of Proof to the accused to prove there is no possible way the tax can be valid. Such a proof is impossible.

Expand full comment